• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Coffee Review

The World's Leading Coffee Guide

Advanced Search

  • Reviews
    • Latest Reviews
    • Top 30 Coffees of 2024
    • Top-Rated (94+)
    • Espressos
    • Best Values
    • Taiwan Coffees – 台灣送評的咖啡豆
    • Single-Serve Formats
    • Reviews by Country of Origin
    • Reviews by U.S. City
    • Green/Unroasted
    • Advanced Search
    • Equipment Reviews
  • Reports
    • Latest Reports
    • Africa
    • Americas
    • Asia-Pacific
    • Espressos
    • Annual Top 30
    • Processing Method
    • Social/Environmental
    • Tree Variety
    • Blends
    • Equipment
  • Equipment
    • Equipment Reviews
    • Equipment Reports
  • Journal
    • 2025 Editorial Calendar
    • Top 30 Coffees of 2024
    • How Coffee Review Works
  • About
    • Our Story
    • Kenneth Davids
    • Our Team
    • Our Advertisers
    • Learn
      • Interpreting Coffee Reviews
      • Reference
      • Glossary
    • Contact Us
  • Trade
    • 2025 Editorial Calendar
    • Becoming an Advertiser
    • 2025 Media Kit
    • Campaign Package Deals
    • Getting Coffees Reviewed
    • Quoting Reviews
    • Award Certificates
  • 中文 – Chinese
    • 評介和獎章宣傳使用條款
    • 台灣送評的咖啡豆
    • 如何將您的咖啡送評
    • “行銷攻略” 促銷活動

Shop for top-rated coffees at Durango Coffee Company

Shop for Top-rated coffees at Barrington Coffee Roasters

Shop for top-rated coffees at Kakalove in Taiwan


Premium Coffee Blends

June 1, 2001 by Kenneth Davids

The upside of blending coffees is the possibility of creating a coffee with more range and complexity than can be displayed by a coffee from a single crop or origin. The downside is the potential loss of idiosyncrasy or distinctiveness, the danger of creating a boring muddle rather than a complex symphony.

Although only one of the twelve blends reviewed here struck me as a full-on symphonic masterwork, all are impressive coffee compositions. Furthermore, all are distinctive, and distinctive in ways that appear to reflect the craft and intention of the blender rather than the givens of the component coffees themselves.

Roasters generously submitted over twenty-five blends for this cupping. Of the twelve I chose to review, four are bright, medium-roasted “morning blends,” seven are medium to moderately darker-roasted blends, and two are blends of two different roast styles.

Morning blends ranged from the giddily floral- and fruit-toned Pride of the Andes blend from Neighbors Coffee, to the dry, bordering-on-astringent Eastern Carolina Morning Blend from Classic Coffees, to Caribou Coffee’s grandly classic Daybreak Morning Blend with its intense acidity, voluptuous sweetness, and complex nuance.

The Dark-Roast Contenders

Given the challenges of dark-roasting – particularly the ease with which careless roasting can burn the sugars in the bean rather than richly caramelizing them – the quality and variety of the darker-roasted blends submitted for this cupping were impressive. It is true that a couple of the twenty-five-plus submitted blends were burned, but most were not, and those that were not nicely showcased the pungent yet caramelly character that attracts coffee drinkers to these darker roast styles.

Blending is particularly important with coffees brought to darker roasts. Since individual coffees begin to simplify and lose their distinctiveness when roasted darker (Kenya becomes a bit less Kenya-like, Antigua a bit less Antigua-like), blending offers the possibility of compensating for this loss by combining coffees that, despite the simplifying impact of the dark roast, preserve enough character individually to collectively create a distinctive, nuanced cup.

Which is exactly what the six darker-roasted blends reviewed here accomplished. They displayed something extra, a bonus, whether the roasted nut tones of the Café Moto Dolphin Blend, the earthy character of the PJ’s Viennese Blend, or the floral and sweet-ferment fruit notes of the Solstice Blend from Intelligentsia Coffee Roasters.

An Achilles Aftertaste

Despite their overall success, several of the blends displayed a bitterness in the aftertaste. It’s axiomatic among coffee professionals that the last impression a coffee leaves with the coffee drinker is the most important impression. In other words, a really fine coffee should preserve its character and quality even after it has cooled. Furthermore, hot or cold, it should leave us with an aftertaste that persists on the palate with satisfying resonance as the caffeine simultaneously begins to light up our nervous system.

All of the reviewed blends were quite satisfying in the cup when hot, but a handful faded to a thin astringency or bitterness toward the finish. I introduce the term “thin” very deliberately, because the two Café Moto blends, both big, full-bodied, moderately dark-roasted coffees, finished bitterly but also richly and ruggedly. In other words, I’m distinguishing between a rich, full bitterness that some coffee drinkers, particularly those who take their coffee with milk, may enjoy, and a thin, listless bitterness.

Read the Fine Print

The issue of different kinds of bitter finish leads to the unresolvable issue of the relativity of taste. I need to regularly remind readers that simply buying the highest rated coffee in any given cupping can lead to disappointment. The Caribou Sunrise Morning Blend is, from a classic coffee perspective, by far the finest coffee in the cupping: powerful, without shadow or fault, acidity perfectly balanced by sweetness, as delicious cold as it is when hot. But many coffee drinkers may find the Caribou blend too challenging, too acidy. They may prefer a coffee with the rich bittersweetness of a good dark roast. Or a lighter roasted coffee with a natural sweetness and subdued acidity, like Alan’s Blend from Polly’s Gourmet Coffee, or the sweet, balanced completeness of Coffee Roasters of Pasadena’s Chuck Roast. Still others may prefer a coffee that teases with an odd or ambiguous edge – that incorporates the sweet taste of fermented fruit, for example, or earth tones.

It is true that a couple of the coffees I received for this cupping (not reviewed here) were outright bad by any standard. But the twelve coffees I did review are all winners in their own way, and, if you take the time to read the fine print, possibly in yours as well.

Read Reviews


Filed Under: Blends, Tasting Reports

About the Author: Kenneth Davids

Kenneth Davids is editor, chief writer and co-founder of Coffee Review. His latest book, 21st Century Coffee: A Guide is an unprecedentedly thorough survey of specialty coffee in all of its aspects, authoritative yet engaging. He has been involved with coffee since the early 1970s and has published three earlier books on coffee, including the influential Home Roasting: Romance and Revival, now in its second edition, and Coffee: A Guide to Buying, Brewing and Enjoying, which has sold nearly 250,000 copies in five editions.

Primary Sidebar

Shop for top-rated coffees at Durango Coffee Company

Shop for Top-rated coffees at Barrington Coffee Roasters

Shop for top-rated coffees at Kakalove in Taiwan

Become an advertiser

Get Coffees Reviewed

Connect with Us

Sign Up for Our Free E-Newsletter

Enter your email address below to receive our free e-mail newsletter
  • Coffee Reviews
  • Tasting Reports
  • Reference
  • Glossary
  • Please Support Our Advertisers
  • Contact Us
  • Journal
  • Kenneth Davids
  • Interpreting Coffee Reviews
  • Roast Definitions
  • Caveats about Coffee Ratings
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Getting Coffees Reviewed
  • Advertising Opportunities
  • Quoting Reviews
  • Copyright
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Security

Copyright © 2025 Coffee Review. All Rights Reserved.