We found 9 reviews that match your search for October 2002. Coffees are listed in reverse chronological order by review date. Older reviews may no longer accurately reflect current versions of the same coffee. Click on roaster images to visit roaster websites.
Both John Weaver and Ken admired this dark-roasted Ethiopia. John: "My
favorite of this cupping. Obviously East African. Bright acidity with exceptional flavor. Nice
roast for this coffee, although I might have taken it a hair farther to bring out more body" (90).
Ken: "Balanced, sweet, deeply dimensioned integration of rounded acidy notes, crisp roastiness
and a lush, apricot-toned fruit" (91). | ![]() |
John Weaver: "Fast roast, singed beans. Nice flavor though. Quick roast means
bright acidity. A little slower roast would benefit this coffee" (85) Ken: "Elegant balance of fruity
chocolate and leathery roast tones. Some bitterness, but softens toward the finish" (88).
| ![]() |
Both John Weaver and Ken admired this coffee's smooth balance, though Ken
found a bit more to say about the cup than John, who writes: "Good, medium-bodied coffee with
smooth flavor and aftertaste" (84). Ken: "Pleasant balance of subdued acidy and round roast
tones, complicated by sweet fruit chocolate, tastes a whole lot like butterscotch in the finish"
(87). | ![]() |
John Weaver: "Nice medium body with bright, sparkly flavor notes. Tangy
flavor" (81). Ken particularly liked the "tangy" character: "sweetly fruity, with some floral
complication, rounded rather than repressed by the roast. Slightly astringent finish" (87).
| ![]() |
Not much nuance here, but a solid ultra-dark roast. John Weaver: "Good clean
flavor with mellow body and a nice finish" (83). Ken: "Balanced dark roast. Bittersweet, medium
body, smooth mouthfeel, though a touch astringent in the finish" (82).
| ![]() |
John Weaver was not excited: "Medium-bodied, a little flat. Some good wine
tones with a little citric flavor" (80). Ken, who tends to value nuance, rewarded this coffee for its
"sweet roastiness complicated by smoky, fruity chocolate tones that carry from cup through the
mildly astringent finish" (85).
| ![]() |
John: "Light bodied, simple profile. Slightly earthy, good looking roast. Nice
cover with little inside" (80). Ken also notes the thinnish mouthfeel and light body, but finds the
flavor contrasts interesting and worth rewarding: "Sharply burned yet sweet and fruity. Dry
chocolate in the finish" (83) | ![]() |
"Medium- to full-bodied blend. Looks like two different roasts
blended. Good, full finish" (81). Ken: "Sweet charred tones with some smoky spice in the nose.
In the cup fruity, acidy tones nicely survive the roast but sweetness doesn't: ultimately a little
too bitter for me" (81). | ![]() |
"Light-bodied with an almost rioy flavor. Quakers, soft, wild-looking.
Could have been better if roasted a little darker?" (78). Rioy is a hard, medicinal flavor taken on
by some dry-processed coffees during the drying. Quakers are beans that fail to take the roast
and remain light, robbing the coffee of flavor and body. Ken: "Burned tones, faint sweetness, not
much else" (78). | ![]() |